Why Meaningful Messages Matter More Than Feeds
A new Canadian study prompts a better question than screen time: how can digital interactions feel more intentional, specific, and more human?
Loovity Team · ·

The quality of an online interaction can matter as much as its frequency. A Canadian study that drew attention this week found that, among adults aged 55 and older, the use of social-networking sites was associated with poorer self-rated mental health, while email use was associated with better self-rated mental health. The findings do not show that one tool causes the outcome. They do invite a better question than “Should we spend less time online?”: what kind of interaction are we choosing when we connect?
What the new research does—and does not—tell us
A study published in PLOS Global Public Health on June 24, 2026, analyzed 2022 Canadian Internet Use Survey data from 13,536 adults aged 55 and older. Researchers compared several forms of digital communication, including email, messaging apps, social-networking sites, voice and video calls, dating sites, and uploading content.
After accounting for demographic factors, they found different associations across tools. Email use was positively associated with self-rated mental health, while social-network use was negatively associated. Instant messaging and voice or video calls showed no statistically significant association in this analysis.
The important point is not that email is “good” and social media is “bad.” Being online is not a single behaviour. A direct message to a friend, a video call with family, a public post, and an hour of passive scrolling can all feel very different, even though they happen on a screen.
The researchers are clear about the study’s limits. Because it was cross-sectional, it cannot establish cause and effect. It also did not measure how often people used each tool, how long they used it, whether they were actively participating or passively scrolling, or the quality of specific exchanges. The study is not a verdict on social media, nor is it a wellness prescription for email. It is a useful prompt to look beyond screen time and consider purpose, pace, and reciprocity.
That distinction matters as digital communication becomes more embedded in everyday life. Statistics Canada reportedthat email was the most common online communication activity among Canadians aged 65 and older in 2022, ahead of messaging apps and social-networking sites. Familiarity with a tool, however, does not automatically make an interaction meaningful.
Attention and appreciation are not the same thing
A feed can create the feeling of being around people without requiring much presence from us. It offers updates, reactions, and many opportunities to be seen. That can be useful, entertaining, and genuinely connective. But attention in a feed is often broad and fast: a view, a like, or a reply sent between other tasks.
Appreciation works differently. It is specific and directed. It says, “I noticed what you did,” “I remember what matters to you,” or “Your effort made a difference.” It does not need an audience, a streak, or a public metric.
That is why a brief, considered message can carry more weight than a busy comment section. Its value is not in its length or polish. It comes from the evidence that someone paused, paid attention, and chose their words.
Loovity is built around that kind of pause. With only five Loovs per day, the point is not to make recognition artificially scarce. It is to make the choice more visible: whom do you want to acknowledge today, and what exactly are you recognizing?
A practical shift: make one interaction more specific
The next time you open a social app, replace one passive action with a deliberate one:
Choose one person rather than a general audience.
Name one real detail: an effort, a quality, a moment, or an effect.
Send it without asking for anything in return.
For example: “I keep thinking about how calmly you handled that difficult conversation. You helped the room feel safer.” It is a small message, but it is not an empty one.
This will not turn every digital interaction into a close relationship, and it does not need to. The point is to use the tools we already have with a little more intention. Before the next scroll, consider offering one person something more valuable than attention: clear, genuine appreciation.
Read next
What Social Media Age Bans Can—and Cannot—Do
Australia’s early results show that age bans can reduce account ownership, but healthier online habits require more than an access rule alone.
Why Social Apps May Work Better When They Do Less
Social apps do not need every feature in one place. A clearer purpose can reduce friction, support better choices and make online time more intentional.
ADHD Social Media Limits Without Guilt or Shame
Social media limits can support people with ADHD when they reduce friction without using shame, broken streaks or rigid all-or-nothing rules.